Profile

servermonkey: (Default)
servermonkey

January 2020

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
servermonkey: (Default)
[personal profile] servermonkey
It's here: http://www.nullsoft.com/cookie/winamp29beta2_full.exe

Eventually, skinning features from 3.0 will be incorporated into 2.8 and then Nullsoft is skipping 4.0 and releasing 5.0, Netscape style. 3.0 is dead, and I hope it remains that way. I'm not altogether sure what's true or not, but there you are. . .

I am so glad that 3.0 is being discontinued. It, uh, sucked. It did not whip the llama's ass at all.

A short Post Script (the read me of the Winamp installer:

Known issues:

* The Vorbis tag updating through the media library may be buggy, please test.

* the minibrowser page says "upgrade". =)

* running a fullscreen visualization plugin when playing video (or vice versa) can be bad
(i.e. cause Winamp to quit). This appears to be a directdraw issue, we'll figure out why.

* new extended skin format may change for 2.90, so don't distribute new skins too widely.

* some AVI/MPEG/ASF/etc videos may be flipped, due to directshow weirdness. We will work to correct this as
much as possible.

* Some MPEG2 video decompressors (latest PowerDVD one apparently) may have issues with playback.

* Many more configuration options and fixes should be added in the 2.90 to 2.9x land. Enjoy.

And so far, I haven't noticed too much of a difference at all. Oh well.
(deleted comment)
Date: 2003-03-25 08:59 am (UTC)

From: [identity profile] servermonkey.livejournal.com
sadly, yeah, I think so. I never had anything but problems with 3.0.

It's up to you. If you like 3.0, stick with it. For all I know right now, it all may be a rumor.
(deleted comment)
Date: 2003-03-25 01:55 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] servermonkey.livejournal.com
Poor Stan.

Hope you have a good experience with the beta. So far, so good for me, despite not really noticing too much that's different. Actually, nothing at all. . .
Date: 2003-03-25 08:44 am (UTC)

From: [identity profile] chandrax93.livejournal.com
winamp 3.0 was good for it's little corner skin. then they got rid of it. and it wouldn't play my wma's right. so back to windows media player i go (they have a cool feature that minimizes the player controls to the taskbar ooooh!).
Date: 2003-03-25 09:01 am (UTC)

From: [identity profile] servermonkey.livejournal.com
My biggest complaints with Windows Media Player are:

1) It always seemed like such a memory hog to me.

B) I could never figure out how to jump from song to song at my leisure, and I could never get the keyboard commands (are there any?).

It could be a matter of a strong anti-Microsoft sentiment.
Date: 2003-03-25 01:19 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] chandrax93.livejournal.com
yeah, there are keyboard commands i think, though i have never used them (bless the logitech keyboard media buttons). at first i was very adverse to WMP, but it has definitely grown on me (plus they keep making cool new features). i like how it automatically adds every song i download into folders i designate to my media library. it also has a really good search engine thingy, so i can catagorize songs as having to do with astronauts, search for "astronauts" and they all come up =)
Date: 2003-03-25 01:54 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] servermonkey.livejournal.com
LOL @ your media buttons comment.

I guess it's a matter of me getting older and resisting change. The sorting feature is indeed a nice thing, as I tend to get retentive about how my MP3s are grouped and such.

I've also heard/read about Windows XP and Media Player getting along so well that you can select all of your MP3s and it'll go out and auto-tag 'em pretty reliably.

Unfortunately, I don't run XP, and am going to fight it as long as I can.

How many songs with astronauts are there? Right now, only Space Oddity and Major Tom come to mind.
Page generated Aug. 10th, 2025 03:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios